Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies/Changes to Membership
Please note the timings of the
meetings:
School Forum Members to attend meeting at
9am
Invitees from the Local Authority to
attend the meeting at 10.15am
Jake Grinsill is stepping
down
Early years rep
required.
Minutes:
1.
Attendance and Apologies
- Chair: Sarah
Tomkinson
- Vice Chair:
Stuart Biddles
- Minute Taker:
Louise Willmott
- Attendees
- Sarah Tomkinson,
Stuart Bellworthy, Alex Newton, Tim Stephens, Laurence Frewin,
Sally Banfield, Stewart Biddles, Steven Hulme and Steve
Margetts
- Hannah Baker, Rob
Parr, Gina Powell
- Apologies from Nancy
Meehan, Dan Hamer,
- Noted resignations:
Jake Grinsall and Jane Jones, Debbie Horn
Action: Minute formal thanks to both for their service and
impact on children in Torbay.
Membership Gaps
- Noted resignation of
Debbie Horn and other vacancies: primary maintained governor,
primary academy leader, secondary maintained governor, secondary
academy governor, and Early Years PVI representative.
- Action: Louise
Willmott to email all stakeholders to seek nominations and minute
the current gaps.
Election of Chair and Vice Chair
- Sarah Tomkinson
confirmed as Chair for the academic year.
- Stewart Biddles
confirmed as Vice Chair.
- Decision: Both
appointments ratified for the 2025/26 academic year.
|
2. |
Minutes of the last meeting PDF 283 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.
Minutes of Previous Meeting
- No amendments were
proposed.
- Decision:
Minutes of the previous meeting were approved as a true
record.
|
3. |
Re check guidance on decision making
|
4. |
10.15 am Torbay council to Join the meeting
|
5. |
Tribunal Statistics – Hannah Baker PDF 429 KB
Minutes:
5.
Tribunal Statistics
- Hannah Baker
presented data indicating a slight decline in concluded tribunals
and mediations, attributed to improved early resolution
processes.
- Noted increased
requests for special school places from Devon and Plymouth
authorities.
- Action: Hannah
Baker to provide further data at the next meeting, including:
- Mediation trends
- Tribunal requests
resolved prior to hearing
- Direction to take
statistics
- Decision:
Forum to receive a more detailed breakdown at the next
meeting.
Discussion Points:
- Cost implications:
Tribunal outcomes impact the Schools Forum budget, particularly for
independent sector placements (approx. £75,000 per annum per
placement).
- Difficulty in
returning pupils from independent to LA provision after tribunal
order.
- Decision:
Forum to monitor budgetary impact and sufficiency of
provision.
|
6. |
Financial Reports- Rob Parr PDF 214 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.
Financial Reports – Early Years Budget (Rob Parr)
Early Years Budget Detail
- The Early Years
budget lines have been adjusted due to movement from deprivation
funding to the ALFE (Additional Learning Funding for Early Years)
line.
- The retained element
of the Early Years budget is now focused solely on staffing and
licensing costs, with no buffer remaining after reductions agreed
at the previous Forum.
- The Synergy license
cost has increased by approximately
£15,000–£20,000.
- The retained element
was underspent by over £100,000 in the previous year, but the
current year’s budget reflects increased staffing and
licensing costs.
- Action: Rob
Parr to provide a detailed breakdown of staffing costs and
budget-setting principles for the next meeting, including full-time
equivalent (FTE) data and rationale for budget projections.
Discussion Points:
- Medical Tuition
Service (MTS) underspend noted; service has now been brought back
in-house.
- Commissioned places
versus pupil places: Sally Banfield requested clarification and
correction of figures, particularly for Home School, to ensure
accuracy in reporting.
- Action: Rob
Parr to clarify and update commission places and pupil places
figures for future meetings.
Decision: Forum
to review budget-setting process and assumptions at the next
meeting.
|
7. |
Safety Valve Update- Hannah Baker
Minutes:
7&8. Safety Valve Position
- Monitoring reports
have been submitted; the Safety valve programme is not on track for
a balanced position within the original safety valve agreement
timeframe.
- Noted a sharp
increase in statutory assessment requests (EHCPs) in July
2025.
- Action: Hannah
Baker to update the Forum on value-for-money initiatives and the
impact of the forthcoming national White Paper.
- Decision:
Forum to monitor demographic changes and implications for future
planning.
Summary of Actions
- Minute formal thanks
to Jake Grinsall and Jane Jones.
- Chair to write to
Nancy regarding Early Years funding escalation.
- Louise Willmott to
email for new members and minute membership gaps.
- Hannah Baker to
provide further tribunal and mediation data at next meeting.
- Rob Parr to provide
staffing and budget breakdowns for Early Years at next
meeting.
- Forum to monitor
safety valve position, demographic changes, and value-for-money
initiatives.
- Forum to consider
implications of Schools Block transfer for future years.
Summary of Decisions
- Sarah Tomkinson and
Stewart Biddles confirmed as Chair and Vice Chair for the
year.
- Minutes of previous
meeting approved.
- Not to pursue 0.5%
Schools Block transfer for 2026–27.
- Actions to improve
attendance, membership, and data transparency agreed.
|
8. |
Schools Forum Update 16th Sep 25 - Copy (1) PDF 407 KB
|
9. |
AOB plus future dates
20/11/25
26/2/26
23/4/26
18/6/26
Minutes:
9.AOB Schools Block Transfer to High Needs Block
Background
During the meeting,
the Principal Accountant (Rob Parr) mentioned that the Director of
Finance
(Malcolm Coe) had raised the possibility of 0.5% virement of
the Schools Block to the High Needs Block in future financial
years, as a means of addressing the ongoing and cumulative deficit
in the High Needs budget. This option is being considered by the
Director of Finance in response to significant financial pressures,
including increased demand for SEND provision and insufficient
Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) settlements.
Discussion
- The Forum was
informed that, should the local authority wish to pursue a transfer
of up to 0.5% from the Schools Block to the High Needs Block, this
proposal must first be presented to the Schools Forum for
approval.
- If the Schools Forum
does not approve the virement, the local authority retains the
right to submit a “disapplication request” to the
Secretary of State for Education via the Department for Education
(DfE). This process allows the DfE to adjudicate and potentially
override the Forum’s decision, should the local authority
demonstrate sufficient need and justification.
- It was clarified
that, in order to ensure fairness across
all schools, the local authority would also need to request
disapplication of the .5 virement, the Minimum Funding Guarantee
(MFG) and Minimum Per Pupil Funding Level (MPPL) so that the
financial impact of the transfer is distributed equitably.
- For Torbay, a 0.5%
transfer would equate to approximately £545,000 in additional
funding for the High Needs Block, based on current figures.
However, due to the prevalence of schools on minimum funding
levels, less than half of Torbay schools would contribute under
current arrangements unless disapplication is granted.
Decisions and Actions
- Decision: The
Schools Forum agreed that the 0.5% transfer will not be pursued for
the 2026–27 financial year. However, the option may be
revisited for 2027–28, depending on future budgetary
pressures and the outcome of national policy changes (including the
anticipated White Paper).
- Action: The
Forum requested that, should the proposal be brought forward in
future, all possible options and cost implications be thoroughly
explored and presented for consideration. The Forum also requested
early notification and full transparency regarding any intention to
submit a disapplication request to the DfE.
- Action: The
Forum will monitor developments and ensure that any future decision
regarding the Schools Block transfer is made in accordance with
statutory guidance and following consultation with all affected
stakeholders.
Reference to DfE
- The process for
referring the matter to the DfE is as follows:
- The local authority
proposes the transfer and seeks Schools Forum approval.
- If the Forum does not
approve, the local authority may submit a formal disapplication
request to the Secretary of State for Education.
- The DfE will review
the request, consider the rationale and supporting evidence, and make a final
determination.
- The outcome will be
communicated to both the local authority and the Schools Forum, and implemented as directed.
Next Steps
|