Decision details

Petition requesting a covenant protecting Churston Golf Course from development and Monitoring Officer Report pursuant to Section 5 Local Government and Housing Act 1989

Decision Maker: Elected Mayor

Decision status: Recommmend Forward to Council

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Decision:

That following receipt of a valuation from the District Valuer dated 17 May 2017 which at paragraph 11 confirms that a 10 year covenant would not have an effect of the value of the Council’s property interest in land comprising Churston Golf Course the Council enters into a deed of covenanting with the residents of Churston & Galmpton ward in the following terms:-

 

‘Torbay Council covenants with all inhabitants of the ward of Churston and Galmpton that for a period of 10 years beginning on the date of this deed it will not on the land, shown edged in red on the plan attached to the submitted report to the Council meeting on 25 September 2014, known to be Churston Golf Course, allow any development of Churston Golf Course without any such proposal first obtaining the majority of votes in a referendum of the persons who at the day of the referendum would be entitled to vote as electors at an election of Councillors for the Churston and Galmpton Ward and are registered as local government electors at an address within this Ward.  For the purposes of this covenant ‘development’ shall not include any development permitted under the terms of the lease between The Council of the Borough of Torbay and Churston Golf Club Limited dated 3 April 2003.  Nothing contained or implied in this Deed shall prejudice or affect the exercise by the Council of its regulatory functions under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or any other statute or statutory instrument.’

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1972, the Mayor on behalf of the Council has all necessary information to make this Covenant.  The covenant will then be appropriately registered with the Land Registry with immediate effect

Reasons for the decision:

To implement the Mayor’s Decision of 4 December 2014.

Alternative options considered:

Alternatives were considered.

One alternative considered was that the Mayor should move away from the clear commitment he has at all times made to the residents of Churston and Galmpton and deny them a covenant.  The Mayor does not prefer this option particularly when other covenants have recently been made for the people of Torquay in relation to Windmill Hill.

Another alternative considered was to revisit the previous circumstances which prevented the original 100 year covenant being implemented.  The Mayor does not prefer this option either.

On balance and having considered all the options the Mayor has determined a 10 year covenant is in the interest of Torbay as a whole.

Implementation:

This decision will come into force and may be implemented on 12 July 2017 unless the call-in procedure is triggered (as set out in the Standing Orders in relation to Overview and Scrutiny).

Information:

At the Council meeting held on 4 December 2014 the Mayor decided to make a 100 year covenant.

At that stage the Mayor’s legal advice was that he was required to specifically refer the disposal to the Secretary of State. This he did, but the Secretary of State subsequently confirmed the Mayor was entitled to use the General Disposal Consent and no such referral was in fact required.

The Mayor’s legal advice was then to use the General Disposal Consent.  This he did, but on the day satisfactory information was provided to the Mayor to allow him to rely on said consent the Council amended its constitution removing the Mayor’s ability to implement the decision.

The Mayor continues to be able to make decisions on covenants where there is no value impact.  The Mayor has been advised by the District Valuer that a 10 year covenant will not have a value impact.  Accordingly, the Mayor has made a 10 year covenant.

 

The Mayor’s decision is set out above.

Interests and Nature of Interests Declared:

None.

Publication date: 03/07/2017

Date of decision: 27/06/2017

Effective from: 12/07/2017

This decision has been called in by:

  • Councillor David Thomas who writes The decision of the Mayor is contrary to the Policy Framework as, taking the advice of the District Valuer, the imposition of a covenant will restrict or reduce the current or future value of the land comprising Churston Golf Course. As such, the Mayor is acting beyond his powers and against the specific advice of the Monitoring Officer. "
  • Councillor Steve Darling who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"
  • Councillor Chris Lewis who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"
  • Councillor Anna Tolchard who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"
  • Councillor Lynn Sykes who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"
  • Councillor Barbara Lewis who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"
  • Councillor Mike Morey who writes "I support Councillor David Thomas"

Accompanying Documents: