Agenda and minutes

Venue: Meadfoot Room, Town Hall, Castle Circus, Torquay, TQ1 3DR

Contact: Lisa Antrobus  Governance Support Officer

Items
No. Item

9.

Election of Chairman/woman

To elect a Chairman/woman for the meeting.

Minutes:

Councillor Ellery was elected as Chairman for the meeting.

10.

Apologies

To receive apologies for absence, including notifications of any changes to the membership of the Committee.

Minutes:

It was reported that the membership of the Sub-Committee had been amended for this meeting by including Councillor Barbara Lewis instead of Councillor Barnby.

11.

5 Walls Hop House, 43 Winner Street, Paignton pdf icon PDF 297 KB

To consider an application for a Premises Licence in respect of 5 Walls Hop House, 43 Winner Street, Paignton.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members considered a report on an application for a Premises Licence in respect of 5 Walls Hop House, 43 Winner Street, Torquay.

 

Written Representations received from:

 

Name

Details

Date of Representation

Member of the Public

Representation objecting to the application on the grounds of ‘The Prevention of Crime and Disorder’ and ‘The Prevention of Public Nuisance.

16 November 2020

Member of the Public

Representation objecting to the application on the grounds of ‘The Prevention of Crime and Disorder’ and ‘The Prevention of Public Nuisance’.

17 November 2020

 

Oral Representations received from:

 

Name

Details

Applicant

The Applicant outlined his application and responded to Members questions.

Member of the Public

A Member of the Public outlined his objection to the application and believed that his representation related to ‘The Prevention of Crime and Disorder’ and ‘The Protection of Children from Harm’.

 

Decision:

 

That the application for 5 Walls Hop House, 43 Winner Street, Paignton be granted, as applied for.

 

Reason for Decision:

 

Having carefully considered all of the written and oral Representations, Members resolved to grant the Licence, having been reassured by the Applicant’s detailed and thorough oral representation.

 

In coming to their decision, Members had regard to the concerns raised by two Members of the Public, and whilst sympathetic to those anticipated concerns, Members were mindful that their written and oral Representations were largely based upon assumptions, rather than being evidence based.

 

Members noted that there were no Representations from any of the Responsible Authorities and that the Applicant had engaged with Responsible Authorities, prior to submitting the application. Members therefore drew proportionate inference, that the Responsible Authorities did not have any concerns in respect of this application.

In concluding, Members further noted that should issues arise as a result of this grant, a Review of the Premises Licence is available to Interested Parties and the Responsible Authorities.